MEDIA RELEASE
26 November 2009
EQUALITY ADVOCATES TO FIGHT ON DESPITE SENATE INQUIRY SET-BACK
Vow To Make Equality An Election Issue
Removal of Overseas Gay Marriage Restriction Welcomed
"Kevin Rudd's obsession with opposing full equality for same-sex
couples leaves us with no choice but to make marriage equality a
key issue in the run up to the next federal election."
- Alex Greenwich, Australian Marriage Equality
Australia's marriage equality advocates say they will redouble
their efforts to achieve full legal equality for same-sex
couples following the release of a Senate report today which
upholds the nation's ban on same-sex marriages.
Australian Marriage
Equality spokesperson, Alex Greenwich, said he is frustrated and
disappointed that the Senate inquiry into a Greens' bill
allowing same-sex marriage disregarded the heartfelt views of
over 11,000 Australians from a wide variety of backgrounds who
wrote in support of equality.
"This inquiry has
shown that marriage equality is passionately supported by many
Australians from all walks of life - gay and straight, religious
and non-religious, conservative and
progressive", Mr Greenwich said.
"It has also put on
the official record thousands of personal stories about the way
marriage discrimination hurts, harms and hinders same-sex
couples, their families and the nation - stories we will
continue to bring to the attention of politicians and the
public."
"Unfortunately, the
outcome of the inquiry has also highlighted the fact that the
Rudd Government puts the prejudices of some church groups
before the principle of equality."
"It is illogical and
inconsistent for the Rudd Government to recognise same-sex
couples as de facto married partners in some areas of federal
jurisdiction like superannuation and family law, but for us to
be denied the right to solemnise our relationships under the
Marriage Act."
"Kevin Rudd's
obsession with opposing full equality for same-sex couples
leaves us with no choice but to make marriage equality a key
issue in the run up to the next federal election."
"We will also redouble
our efforts at educating the public and gathering support from
private corporations, government agencies, community
organisations and within the major political parties."
Mr Greenwich welcomed
a recommendation for the removal of a Government ban on gay and
lesbian Australians obtaining the official documents they need
to enter same-sex marriages overseas, a restriction in place
since 2004.
"Lifting the ban on
issuing Certificates of Non-Impediment to Marriage to same-sex
partners marrying overseas will make it easier for these
partners to marry, and is also a reminder that other governments
offer more legal respect to gay and lesbian Australians than
their own government."
The inquiry also recommended
that the Government
ask the Australian Law Reform Commission to conduct
a review of relationship laws to ensure
"national consistency", which is already Labor Party
policy.
Mr Greenwich said any
review will be pointless unless it includes same-sex
marriage.
"Existing state and
territory partnership schemes are fine for people
who don't want to marry, but they are no substitute
for equality in marriage, and we reject a review
which is simply aimed at legitimising the exclusion
of same-sex couples from marriage."
"We have a meeting
with the Attorney-General, Robert McClelland, on 7
December at which we will urge
him to allow the Australian Law Reform Commission to
include same-sex marriage in any inquiry he asks it
to conduct."
On Saturday there will
be rallies for marriage equality around the nation
to commence a national year of action on the issue.
For more on Saturday's events
visit: www.australianmarriageequality.com/nya.htm
Further
information about today's report
The Senate Legal and
Constitutional Affairs Committee's inquiry into the Australian
Greens' Marriage Equality Amendment Bill 2009 received 28,000
submissions - more than any other Senate inquiry in Australian
history. 11,000 submissions were received from supporters of
equality and 17,000 from opponents, mostly conservative
Christians.
The inquiry recommended that:
1.
The Government review
(by reference to the Australian Law Reform Commission or some
other appropriate mechanism) relationship recognition
arrangements with the aim of developing a nationally consistent
framework to provide official recognition for same-sex couples
and equal rights under federal and state laws,
2. The Department of Foreign
Affairs and Trade issue Certificates of Non-Impediment to
Marriage to couples of the same sex on the same basis as they
are issued to couples of different sex, and
3. The (Marriage Equality
Amendment) Bill not be passed.
The inquiry's rationale can be
found in the conclusion of its report...
The Committee has been
overwhelmed by public inquiries and submissions to the inquiry.
The changes canvassed by the Bill are highly emotive and
extremely controversial. Both those in favour and those against
the bill have argued their case passionately and compellingly.
The Committee has much sympathy with those in support of the
Bill particularly the importance of supporting same-sex
attracted people who have suffered discrimination over many
years to prosper on an equal footing with heterosexual
Australians. The Committee hopes its recommendations to review
relationship recognition arrangements and implement and
implement a nationally-consistent framework will promote this
outcome. The committee considers the current policy in relation
to Certificates of Non-Impediment to Marriage to be not
appropriate in all circumstances and warrants reversal. All
other things being equal, same-sex couples proposing to legally
marry overseas should not face administrative hurdles imposed by
Australia. While the Committee agrees the current definition of
marriage in the Marriage Act is appropriate, other types of
relationships play an important part in Australian society and
deserve recognition. For this reason the Committee's
recommendation not to change the definition of marriage should
not be taken as a lack of support for same-sex couples. However,
the Committee considers that the current definition is a clear
and well recognised legal term that should be preserved.
|